I was so puzzled by that scene: I know you guys have a TV and I know you enjoy watching. When Vicki asked about the TV, it was such a cheesy bit of editing to make it seem like you'd answered "No". I was confused by the edit and confused about why FOX had done it. Now I know why. It was to start making a story line for the story they wanted to present. Just as we edit our posts here, FOX cut and pasted 2 families.
I hope even doubters can look at your picture (nice evidence, btw), listen to people who know you and start to "get it". Folks: These are good people, the kids aren't hog tied to the family bed, they are master musicians that get out and about interacting with a variety of people every day (I was one of them when I lived next door). They signed up for a reality TV show! Imagine that. Who among us would be open, free and brave enough to do that? Also, if Luke is such a cool cat (and, he is, no big editing there) why is that? Could it be due in part to the careful, loving, intelligent manner in which he and Kyle were raised?
I'll tell you as someone who has watched these boys grow up: They are take charge kids, now young men, who have been fostered to do_what_they_want and do it well. I have no doubt they will continue to impress, and no doubt their strong connection to family will serve them well as they do.
Comments
there are tons of discussion of how cute the boys are.....
"i agree. i mean, i'm a guy, and straight, but those two boys, if they straightened up, could be VERY attractive. I was watching the show with someone, and we were commenting on how if Kyle went to school, he would have girls falling all over him and how Luke is just flat out attractive and you're right, he probably does have some serious wood haha ... but yeah, both of them are quite attractive and if they had gone to school, would have girls all over them. That's why I was angry the father didn't let them go, I mean, they haven't had their first kiss! Kyle is understandable, he's 14, but Luke!?"
Susan
Love life? What love life?
I agree, the boys are handsome and charismatic ... but I agree with the above post. Lets give them privacy on that one.
Well, I'm not really a girl person quite yet if you know what I mean and modeling isn't my thing. I don't want girls all over me. Sorry ladies! *whistle!*
Are you reading anything we've said on the site!? You shouldn't be angry at pap not letting us go because he says we can go whenever we want! He's not holding us down in any way! They portrayed him as a tin headed tyrant but the magic of editing can make him (anybody actually) look like anybody they want him to look like.
I don't find looks to show a person who he/she is. I mean take for example, Oda Nobunaga (you might want to look him up on google). I saw a picture of him and he was . . . good looking (in a way) but he was a ruthless, cunning, bloodthristy Diamyo. That may be a bit over the edge but you get my point. Looks don't mean much to me and so I don't spend hours grooming my hair or getting my nails done. It must just be my irrisistable charm!
This my friend, is what would make you such a "hottie" to the people who have said so :idea: Everyone knows, the truly good looking are those who don't know how good looking they are I should know!!
But good looks are an accident. It is definately your charm and modesty that make you irresistable, though the two of you are very handsome. Your dad is cute, what I could see under his beard. Your mom is so beautiful and full of grace, too.
How sucky were they: well, back then we had rocks as pets, and got excited about it!
Nowadays, you have the internet, Koi fish, and chia pets...
Now you can have a pet on your computer. (years ago, I got Cats3 but the novelty wore off fast)
we had slinkys in the 70's, too-sproooooiiiiing! Ow my eye! and spirographs... but mostly we just went outside and threw rocks at hippies...
That was when the projector had to be rolled in, film spool put on, etc...nowdays they have videos and big screen tv's and about a million other movies to watch...