For me this relates to the chapter about the sage doing nothing, and yet nothing is left undone. The sage doesn?t just absolutely do nothing, but does things in a mindful, harmonious way. Within this way, whatever ?potencies? there are in action are done with restraint, like boiling a small fish.
When Carl talked about giving up favoritism for impartiality, I thought of the chapter that speaks of ?flavor-less taste?, of neutrality, in doing things without value judgments.
Also, I see potencies as desires ? in Buddhism the idea isn?t to get rid of desires or potencies. But rather, to observe them ?passing through?, without them grabbing hold of us and taking us on a wild ride. They don?t take us over, so they don?t harm us.
Comments
http://www.centertao.org/viewtopic.php?t=48