It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
[cite] NotTheConstantName:[/cite]The following video is well worth watching. A famous British playright, dying of cancer gives a last interview on TV.
Keep watching to hear him talk of how "the nowness of everything is absolutely wondrous".
A textbook example of achieving clarity through the dropping of the "mask" or ego (he refers to this). In this case, his imminent and unavoidable death has done this unmasking for him. Though I think there are other routes.
You discuss "jumping" in another discussion: Maybe one can make oneself jump (out of the mask, as it were).
But perhaps we need to be pushed.
Comments
For instance, when I began going barefoot full time the calluses on my feet began cracking. I quickly understood that if I picked them enough they would bleed and feel worse. Despite that understanding, once I start picking it is hard to stop – emotionally. It’s like eating potato chips. Yes, [chref=32]knowing when to stop one can be free from danger[/chref]. This experience shows the difference between knowing and understanding. When, [chref=16]holding firmly to stillness[/chref], I ‘tune in’ and settle down, I easily [chref=44]know when to stop[/chref]. It has nothing to do with thinking or understanding. Indeed, those never actually bring me to [chref=9]stop in time[/chref].
Here’s another example: I understand how to play a mandolin, and that allows me to ‘fake it’ a bit. My younger son Kyle knows how to play mandolin marvelously, yet he doesn’t understand how he does it. Alas, some things we understand, some things we know. There exists such a chasm between the two, and yet it seems we tend to think of them as synonymous. Curious.
Certainly the dictionary deems understanding and knowing as synonymous. I just don’t know of a word which conveys the difference I observe or the difference to which chapter 71 alludes... [chref=71]To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.[/chref]
"Understanding" at a shallow, "human" level:
Just as in everything else, if I can analyze something, put it into my thoughts, that's all they are: my thoughts, not the reality of what I'm thinking about. (The name that can be named is not the constant name.)
This connects with what you've said about not being able to teach anyone something. I help my 12 yr. old daughter with her math. No matter how I explain concepts, or walk her through examples, she is only able to do, what she is able to do. And yet, I still help her.
(PS) "And yet, I still help her". As I did Kyle. Although he didn't get much out of the math at the time, he 'learned' other aspects of life in being given the opportunity to tackle the impossible. Yep, there's always a silver lining.